Original Articles
30 December 2022
Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)
Pattern and sweep visual evoked potential in the objective determination of visual acuity
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
1159
Views
314
Downloads
129
HTML
Authors
The purpose was to investigate the effects of pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) on the accurate visual acuity (VA) measurement in adults. Medical files of 282 eyes of 141 patients who underwent VA measurement in our electrophysiology laboratory and did not undergo simulation were retrospectively analyzed. The VA was measured using the Snellen chart. Only those with a VA of higher than 1/10 on the Snellen chart were included in the study. The VA was assessed and reported by the pVEP (VA-pVEP) and sVEP test (VA-sVEP). The correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation analysis. Of 141 patients, 92 were males and 49 were females with a mean age of 37.7±18.4 years. There was a strong positive correlation between the VA measured by the Snellen chart and the VA measured by pVEP (VApVEP) (r=0.858, P<0.001). There was a weak positive correlation (r=0.267, P<0.001) between the VA measured by the Snellen chart and the VA measured by the sVEP (VA-sVEP). A weak positive correlation was found for the VA-pVEP and VA-sVEP (r=0.313, P<0.001). For the measurement of the degree of the VA, it seems reasonable to use pVEP initially, while sVEP should be used in cases with short attention span and those who are noncooperative and in infants.
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Weinstein GW. Clinical aspects of the visually evoked potential. Ophthalmic Surg 1978;9:56-65.
Arden GB, Lewis DR. The pattern visual evoked response in the assessment of visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1973;93:39-48.
Jeon J, Oh S, Kyung S. Assessment of visual disability using visual evoked potentials BMC Ophthalmol 2012;12:36.
Szabela DA, Pałenga-Pydyn D. Usefulness of visual evoked potentials in visual acuity examination]. Klin Oczna 2001;103:141-5.
Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials. (2016 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2016;133:1-9.
Harding GFA. Visual evoked cortical potentials. Basic recording. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology and vision. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 1991. pp 398-407.
Gündoğan FÇ, Sobacı G, Erdurman C, Hamurcu MŞ. The correlations between simultaneously recorded pattern visual evoked cortical potentials and pattern electroretinogram. Gulhane Med J 2009;51:34-8.
de Freitas Dotto P, Cavascan NN, Berezovsky A, et al. Sweep visually evoked potentials and visual findings in children with West syndrome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014;18:201-10.
Gündoğan FC, Kılıç S, Hamurcu MŞ, et al. Pattern visual evoked response (PVER) test our normal values. Gülhane Med J 2005;47:247-50.
Gundogan FC, Sobaci G, Bayer A. Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of visual acuity in malingering. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2332-7.
Halliday AM, McDonald WI. Visual evoked potentials. In Stalberg E, Young RR, eds. Neurology I: clinical neurophysiology. London: Butterworths; 1981. pp 228-258.
Regan D. Rapid objective refraction using evoked brain potentials. Invest Ophthalmol 1973;12:669-79.
Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K. Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979;18:703-13.
Tyler CW, Nakayama K, Apkarian P, Levi DM. VEP assessment of visual function. Vision Res 1981;21:607-9.
Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Piecuch R, et al. Visual acuity development in normal and abnormal preterm human infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1987;24:70-4.
Hamer RD, Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hsu-Winges C. The development of monocular and binocular VEP acuity. Vision Res 1989;29:397-408.
Gottlob I, Fendick MG, Guo S, et al. Visual acuity measurements by swept spatial frequency visual-evoked-cortical potentials (VECPs): clinical application in children with various visual disorders. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990;27:40-7.
Thompson DA, Moller H, Russell-Eggitt I, et al. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:794-8.
Katsumi O, Arai M, Wajima R, et al. Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus. Vision Res 1996;36:903-9.
Strasburger H, Remky A, Murray IJ, et al. Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity with the steady-state visual evoked potential. Ger J Ophthalmol 1996;5:42-52.
Ridder WH 3rd, McCulloch D, Herbert AM. Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:2759-68.
Ridder WH 3rd. Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;109:239-47.
Arai M, Katsumi O, Paranhos FRL, et al. Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:442-7.
Allen D, Bennett PJ, Banks MS. The effects of luminance on FPL and VEP acuity in human infants. Vision Res 1992;32:2005-12.
Bradfield YS, France TD, Verhoeve J, Gangnon RE. Sweep visual evoked potential testing as a predictor of recognition acuity in albinism. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:628-33.
Ridder WH, Rouse MW. Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: Predicting posttherapy acuity in amblyopes. Doc Ophthalmol 2007;114:135-45.
Vedentham V, Ratnagiri PK. The Sweep-VEP: A faster estimation of visual acuity in preverbal children. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004;52:175-7.
Prager TC, Zou YL, Jensen CL, et al. Evaluation of methods for assessing visual function of infants. J AAPOS 1999;3:275-82.
How to Cite
Pattern and sweep visual evoked potential in the objective determination of visual acuity. (2022). Italian Journal of Medicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2022.1556
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Giuseppe Nicoletti, Antonio Bonelli, Rocco Clemente, Simona Ciuffreda, Gaetano Dentamaro, Agata Tiziana La Masa, Vito Lascaro, Pasquale Santarcangelo, Adult-onset Still’s disease with secondary macrophage activation syndrome: a case report , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 17 No. 1 (2023)
- Filippo Manelli, Maria Sofia Cotelli, Giovanni Lodoli, Stefano Bonetti, Marinella Turla, Cerebral microbleeds after COVID-19 infection: an Italian case report , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021)
- Prasanta K. Bhattacharya, Aakash Roy, Primary prevention of diabetes mellitus: current strategies and future trends , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017)
- Francesco Orlandini, Filomena Pietrantonio, Luca Moriconi, Micaela La Regina, Antonino Mazzone, Mauro Campanini, A model to improve the appropriateness in the management of acute poly-pathological patients: the Acute Complex Care Model , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017)
- Andrea Donti, Patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke: more shadows than lights? What the internist should know , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 10 No. 3 (2016)
- Roberto Nardi, Marco Masina, Giorgio Cioni, Paolo Leandri, Paola Zuccheri, Generic - equivalent drugs use in internal and general medicine patients: distrust, confusion, lack of certainties or knowledge? Part 1. Pharmacological issues , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2014)
- Vittoria Gammaldi, Anna Guida, Carolina Bologna, Antonietta De Sena, Marina Lugarà, Claudio De Luca, Fabio Granato Corigliano, Mariavittoria Guerra, Gabriella Oliva, Luca Mocerino, Aquilino Flavio Zarrella, Maria Gabriella Coppola, Vincenzo Nuzzo, Paolo Tirelli, Pasquale Madonna, Acquired hemophilia A in a case of purple urine bag syndrome , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024)
- Anita Huparikar, Silky Kothiwal, Sai Ashrita Kanala, Halah Saeed Ahmed Habib, Butchi Raju Akondi, Role of hysteroscopy in categorization of abnormal uterine bleeding in a multispecialty hospital in Bahrain , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024)
- Franco Berti, Tiziana Marcella Attardo, Salva Piras, Letizia Tesei, Daniela Tirotta, Michela Tonani, Greta Castellini, Silvia Gianola, Silvia Minozzi, Short versus long course antibiotic therapy for acute pyelonephritis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018)
- Marta Maset, Elena Garlatti Costa, Giorgio Siro Carniello, Silvia Grazioli, Michela Ghersetti, Pietro Casarin, Fever and erythema: exclude all and then think of Still's disease! , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 10 No. 3 (2016)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.