https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2024.1692
Role of hysteroscopy in categorization of abnormal uterine bleeding in a multispecialty hospital in Bahrain
HTML: 57
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Abnormal uterine bleeding is a broad term involving various irregularities of the menstrual cycle. Previously, various terms were used to define abnormalities in menstrual bleeding. To create a universally accepted system of nomenclature, the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology proposed the new terminology PALM-COIEN. The current study aims to classify cases of abnormal uterine bleeding as per PALM-COIEN. It is a retrospective, observational study using the data from 110 patients, who underwent hysteroscopic evaluation and endometrial biopsy and were categorized based on PALM-COIEN. Patients were grouped under these categories after detailed history, examination, investigations, hysteroscopic findings, and histopathology. Results showed that polyp was the commonest group (n=45, 40.9%) in our study, which was followed by leiomyoma (n=30, 27.27%), ovulatory disturbances (n=28, 25.45%), adenomyosis (n=5, 4.54%), malignancy (n=2, 1.81%) respectively. In conclusion, hysteroscopic evaluation is a simple and useful tool to find out the structural pathologies of PALMCOIEN classification. Further histopathological confirmation of clinical diagnosis can enhance the diagnosis and treatment modalities.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
