Submitted: 28 March 2013
Accepted: 28 March 2013
Published: 24 April 2013
Abstract Views: 1077
PDF: 601
HTML: 219
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Antiplatelet drugs are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel and aspirin improve long-term vascular clinical outcomes in these patients and have become a standard of care. However, many patients still experience ischemic/thrombotic events, and it appears that insufficient response to both aspirin and clopidogrel contribute to this failure. Newer P2Y12 receptor blocker therapy resulted in only an approximately 2% reduction in absolute risk compared with clopidogrel. This indicates that residual ischemic events are mediated by other pathways that are unblocked by current dual antiplatelet therapy. Thrombin is the most potent platelet agonist (over 1000 times more than adenosine diphosphate on a molar basis). Thrombin-mediated platelet activation depends on proteaseactivated receptor (PAR) binding. PAR-1 is the main receptor for thrombin on human platelets; PAR-4 may contribute to platelet activation at much higher concentrations of thrombin. Inhibition of the PAR-1 may provide additional benefits over the standard dual antiplatelet therapy in attenuating ischemic event in patients with ACS. Vorapaxar is a new highly selective oral PAR-1 antagonist that inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation. We review the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical profile of vorapaxar. Although preliminary data indicated that vorapaxar may have the potential to improve ischemic outcomes without significantly increasing bleeding, more recent larger clinical trials seem to be less optimistic about both its effectiveness and safety. At this time, the role of vorapaxar in the settings of atherothrombotic disorders is not clear. Although it may be associated with less bleeding than P2Y12 receptor blockers, its antithrombotic effectiveness and side effects are major concerns.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite

Airoldi, G., & Campanini, M. (2013). Vorapaxar. Italian Journal of Medicine, 7(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2013.88

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.