Original Articles
30 December 2022
Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)
Pattern and sweep visual evoked potential in the objective determination of visual acuity
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
1158
Views
314
Downloads
129
HTML
Authors
The purpose was to investigate the effects of pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) on the accurate visual acuity (VA) measurement in adults. Medical files of 282 eyes of 141 patients who underwent VA measurement in our electrophysiology laboratory and did not undergo simulation were retrospectively analyzed. The VA was measured using the Snellen chart. Only those with a VA of higher than 1/10 on the Snellen chart were included in the study. The VA was assessed and reported by the pVEP (VA-pVEP) and sVEP test (VA-sVEP). The correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation analysis. Of 141 patients, 92 were males and 49 were females with a mean age of 37.7±18.4 years. There was a strong positive correlation between the VA measured by the Snellen chart and the VA measured by pVEP (VApVEP) (r=0.858, P<0.001). There was a weak positive correlation (r=0.267, P<0.001) between the VA measured by the Snellen chart and the VA measured by the sVEP (VA-sVEP). A weak positive correlation was found for the VA-pVEP and VA-sVEP (r=0.313, P<0.001). For the measurement of the degree of the VA, it seems reasonable to use pVEP initially, while sVEP should be used in cases with short attention span and those who are noncooperative and in infants.
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Weinstein GW. Clinical aspects of the visually evoked potential. Ophthalmic Surg 1978;9:56-65.
Arden GB, Lewis DR. The pattern visual evoked response in the assessment of visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1973;93:39-48.
Jeon J, Oh S, Kyung S. Assessment of visual disability using visual evoked potentials BMC Ophthalmol 2012;12:36.
Szabela DA, Pałenga-Pydyn D. Usefulness of visual evoked potentials in visual acuity examination]. Klin Oczna 2001;103:141-5.
Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials. (2016 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2016;133:1-9.
Harding GFA. Visual evoked cortical potentials. Basic recording. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology and vision. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 1991. pp 398-407.
Gündoğan FÇ, Sobacı G, Erdurman C, Hamurcu MŞ. The correlations between simultaneously recorded pattern visual evoked cortical potentials and pattern electroretinogram. Gulhane Med J 2009;51:34-8.
de Freitas Dotto P, Cavascan NN, Berezovsky A, et al. Sweep visually evoked potentials and visual findings in children with West syndrome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014;18:201-10.
Gündoğan FC, Kılıç S, Hamurcu MŞ, et al. Pattern visual evoked response (PVER) test our normal values. Gülhane Med J 2005;47:247-50.
Gundogan FC, Sobaci G, Bayer A. Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of visual acuity in malingering. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2332-7.
Halliday AM, McDonald WI. Visual evoked potentials. In Stalberg E, Young RR, eds. Neurology I: clinical neurophysiology. London: Butterworths; 1981. pp 228-258.
Regan D. Rapid objective refraction using evoked brain potentials. Invest Ophthalmol 1973;12:669-79.
Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K. Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979;18:703-13.
Tyler CW, Nakayama K, Apkarian P, Levi DM. VEP assessment of visual function. Vision Res 1981;21:607-9.
Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Piecuch R, et al. Visual acuity development in normal and abnormal preterm human infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1987;24:70-4.
Hamer RD, Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hsu-Winges C. The development of monocular and binocular VEP acuity. Vision Res 1989;29:397-408.
Gottlob I, Fendick MG, Guo S, et al. Visual acuity measurements by swept spatial frequency visual-evoked-cortical potentials (VECPs): clinical application in children with various visual disorders. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990;27:40-7.
Thompson DA, Moller H, Russell-Eggitt I, et al. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:794-8.
Katsumi O, Arai M, Wajima R, et al. Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus. Vision Res 1996;36:903-9.
Strasburger H, Remky A, Murray IJ, et al. Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity with the steady-state visual evoked potential. Ger J Ophthalmol 1996;5:42-52.
Ridder WH 3rd, McCulloch D, Herbert AM. Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:2759-68.
Ridder WH 3rd. Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;109:239-47.
Arai M, Katsumi O, Paranhos FRL, et al. Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:442-7.
Allen D, Bennett PJ, Banks MS. The effects of luminance on FPL and VEP acuity in human infants. Vision Res 1992;32:2005-12.
Bradfield YS, France TD, Verhoeve J, Gangnon RE. Sweep visual evoked potential testing as a predictor of recognition acuity in albinism. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:628-33.
Ridder WH, Rouse MW. Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: Predicting posttherapy acuity in amblyopes. Doc Ophthalmol 2007;114:135-45.
Vedentham V, Ratnagiri PK. The Sweep-VEP: A faster estimation of visual acuity in preverbal children. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004;52:175-7.
Prager TC, Zou YL, Jensen CL, et al. Evaluation of methods for assessing visual function of infants. J AAPOS 1999;3:275-82.
How to Cite
Pattern and sweep visual evoked potential in the objective determination of visual acuity. (2022). Italian Journal of Medicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2022.1556
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Abbas Riazi, Yunes Panahi, Ali A. Alishiri, Mohammad A. Hosseini, Ali A. Karimi Zarchi, Amirhossein Sahebkar, The impact of saffron (Crocus sativus) supplementation on visual function in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017)
- Iranna Kotturshetti, Basavaraj Vastrad, Veena Kori, Chanabasayya Vastrad, Shivakumar Kotrashetti, Screening of the key genes and signaling pathways for schizophrenia using bioinformatics and next generation sequencing data analysis , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024)
- Roberto Nardi, Franco Berti, Leonardo M. Fabbri, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Ido Iori, Giovanni Mathieu, Giorgio Vescovo, Andrea Fontanella, Antonino Mazzone, Mauro Campanini, Carlo Nozzoli, Dario Manfellotto, on behalf of the FADOI and their Friends in the FFA Project Group, Toward a sustainable and wise healthcare approach: potential contributions from hospital Internal Medicine Departments to reducing inappropriate medical spending , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 7 No. 2 (2013)
- Ahmed E. Taha, Concern for medical students due to their cell phones’ comparatively high contamination with Pantoea agglomerans bacteria with reduced sensitivity to some antimicrobials , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024)
- Chiara Cogliati, Daniela Torzillo, Francesco Casella, Marta Del Medico, Nicola Montano, Bedside echocardiography in internal medicine: which are the key questions and answers for our decision-making? , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2016)
- Mario Visconti, Proton pump inhibitors overuse: only inappropriate prescriptions or further iatrogenic damage? , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 9 No. 3 (2015)
- Gabriella Nucera, Francesco Chirico, Valentina Raffaelli, Pietro Marino, Current challenges in COVID-19 diagnosis: a narrative review and implications for clinical practice , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021)
- Michele Stornello, Roberto Cappellani, Giuseppe Micieli, Simona Sacco, Stefano Spolveri, Roberto Sterzi, Danilo Toni, Antonio Carolei, Cryptogenic stroke , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 10 No. 3 (2016)
- Flavio Tangianu, Paola Gnerre, Fabrizio Colombo, Roberto Frediani, Giuliano Pinna, Franco Berti, Giovanni Mathieu, Micaela La Regina, Francesco Orlandini, Antonino Mazzone, Clelia Canale, Daniele Borioni, Roberto Nardi, Could clustering of comorbidities be useful for better defining the internal medicine patients' complexity? , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2018)
- Aurelio Negro, Rosaria Santi, Chiara Grasselli, Simona Davoli, Franco Perazzoli, A case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in the setting of post-partum preeclampsia with suppressed plasma aldosterone levels and plasma renin activity , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 7 No. 4 (2013)
1-10 of 527
Next
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.