How to choose and become a reviewer for a scientific medical journal

  • Paola Gnerre Internal Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy.
  • Giorgio Vescovo Internal Medicine, A.U.L.S.S. 6, Padova, Italy.
  • Paola Granata PAGEPress Scientific Publications, Pavia, Italy.
  • Cecilia Politi Internal Medicine, F. Veneziale Hospital, Isernia, Italy.
  • Andrea Fontanella Internal Medicine, Buonconsiglio Hospital, Napoli, Italy.
  • Dario Manfellotto Internal Medicine, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy.
  • Roberto Nardi | nardidoc48@gmail.com Internal Medicine, Bologna, Italy.

Abstract

Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. The peer review of scientific manuscripts is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine. Some journals have difficulty in finding appropriate reviewers who are able to complete reviews on time avoiding publication delay. We discuss some of the main issues involved during the peer review process. The reviewer has a direct and important impact on the quality of a scientific medical Journal. Editors select reviewers on the basis of their expertise. Reviewers are more likely to accept to review a manuscript when it is relevant to their area of interest. They should respond to ethical principles, excluding any conflict of interest condition. The reviewer has to be professional, constructive, tactful, empathetic and respectful. Structured approaches, quality indicators and step-by-step process check list formats could be useful in obtaining a good review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2018-06-20
Section
Technical note
Keywords:
Peer review, publishing process, quality of a journal.
Statistics
Abstract views: 713

PDF: 274
HTML: 57
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Gnerre, P., Vescovo, G., Granata, P., Politi, C., Fontanella, A., Manfellotto, D., & Nardi, R. (2018). How to choose and become a reviewer for a scientific medical journal. Italian Journal of Medicine, 12(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2018.1016

Most read articles by the same author(s)