Original Articles
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2010.23
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis in medical inpatients: data from the FADOI €˜â€˜GEMINI'' study
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 26 April 2013
Published: 30 April 2013
Published: 30 April 2013
1626
Views
2920
Downloads
Materials and methods: In a prospective, observational, multicenter study we aimed to contemporarily assess the epidemiology of symptomatic VTE in consecutive patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, to evaluate the impact of potential risk factors, and the attitude of internists towards thromboprophylaxis. A total of 4,846 patients were included, during the period March-September 2006.
Results: Symptomatic VTE was registered in 177 (3.65%) patients; of these, 26 cases (0.55%) occurred with onset of symptoms > 48 hours after admission (‘‘hospital-acquired'' events, primary study end-point). Previous VTE and bed resting were significantly associated with venous thromboembolism, while a trend for increased risk was documented in cancer patients. During hospital stay antithrombotic prophylaxis was globally administered in 41.6% of patients, and in 58.4% of those for which prophylaxis was recommended according to 2004 guidelines by the American College of Chest Physicians. The choice of administering tromboprophylaxis appeared qualitatively adherent to indications from randomized trials and international guidelines, and bed rest was the strongest determinant of the use of prophylaxis.
Conclusions: Data from our real-world study confirm that VTE is a quite common finding in patients admitted to Internal Medicine departments, and recommended tromboprophylaxis is still underused, in particular in some patients groups. Further efforts are needed to better define the risk profile and to optimize prophylaxis in the heterogeneous setting of medical patients.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis in medical inpatients: data from the FADOI €˜â€˜GEMINI’’ study. (2013). Italian Journal of Medicine, 4(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2010.23
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.