Risk factors for venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis in medical inpatients: data from the FADOI ‘‘GEMINI’’ study
AbstractBackground: Though venous thromboembolism (VTE) frequently occurs in non-surgical setting, epidemiology and risk factors for VTE in unselected medical inpatients have not been extensively studied, and uncertainties remain about the prophylactic strategy in these patients.
Materials and methods: In a prospective, observational, multicenter study we aimed to contemporarily assess the epidemiology of symptomatic VTE in consecutive patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, to evaluate the impact of potential risk factors, and the attitude of internists towards thromboprophylaxis. A total of 4,846 patients were included, during the period March-September 2006.
Results: Symptomatic VTE was registered in 177 (3.65%) patients; of these, 26 cases (0.55%) occurred with onset of symptoms > 48 hours after admission (‘‘hospital-acquired’’ events, primary study end-point). Previous VTE and bed resting were significantly associated with venous thromboembolism, while a trend for increased risk was documented in cancer patients. During hospital stay antithrombotic prophylaxis was globally administered in 41.6% of patients, and in 58.4% of those for which prophylaxis was recommended according to 2004 guidelines by the American College of Chest Physicians. The choice of administering tromboprophylaxis appeared qualitatively adherent to indications from randomized trials and international guidelines, and bed rest was the strongest determinant of the use of prophylaxis.
Conclusions: Data from our real-world study confirm that VTE is a quite common finding in patients admitted to Internal Medicine departments, and recommended tromboprophylaxis is still underused, in particular in some patients groups. Further efforts are needed to better define the risk profile and to optimize prophylaxis in the heterogeneous setting of medical patients.
PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.
Copyright (c) 2013 Mauro Campanini, Gualberto Gussoni, Mauro Silingardi, Gianluigi Scannapieco, Carlo Buniolo, Antonella Valerio, Walter Ageno, Ido Iori, Antonino Mazzone, on behalf of the FADOI ‘‘GEMINI’’ study
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.