Internal medicine, complexity, evidence based medicine, almost €˜â€˜without evidences''

Submitted: 30 April 2013
Accepted: 30 April 2013
Published: 30 April 2013
Abstract Views: 1859
PDF: 1142
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Background: Internal medicine has been defined as the specialty of the adult medical complex patients. Complexity science suggests that illness (and health) results from complex, dynamic, and unique interactions between different components of the overall system. In a patient, complexity involves the intricate entanglement of two or more systems (e.g.; body-diseases, family, socioeconomic status, therapies).
Aim of the study: To evaluate the real applicability of Evidence Based Medicne (EBM) in clinical Departments of Internal Medicine and its critical perspectives.
Discussion: Habitually the internist takes decisions in these situations: a) certainty (the ideal decision is adopted and the corresponding strategy follows), b) risk (the more suitable alternative selected can be the determination of the probable value or mathematical hope) and c) uncertainty, in which decisions linked to triple agents: beliefs and personal values of the doctors (I) for their patients (II) in the society (III). In the medical decisions there are often different factors that go beyond the field of technical and scientific knowledge (family, social, economic problems, etc.) and demanding an ethical analysis of the decision.
Conclusions: The €˜â€˜evidence-based medicine'', as other models of care, has €” in itself €” some limitations. €˜â€˜No evidence in medicine'' matters that the postulates of the EBM are not always applicable to the real patients of Internal Medicine wards, mostly elderly, frail, complex, with comorbidities and polipharmacy, often with cognitive dysfunction and limitation of autonomy, with psycho-emotional, social and economic problems. The interacting effects of overall involved diseases/factors and their management require more complex and individualised care than simply the sum of separate guideline components. Further innovation is required to resolve the need to enhance integration of evidence with our patients' values at the €˜â€˜bedside and/or clinic'' management.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

How to Cite

Nardi, R., Fabbri, T., Belmonte, G., Leandri, P., Mazzetti, M., Pasquale, A., Reta, M., Rizzi, C., Scanelli, G., Iori, I., Gussoni, G., Pedace, C., Mathieu, G., & Mazzone, A. (2013). Internal medicine, complexity, evidence based medicine, almost €˜â€˜without evidences’’. Italian Journal of Medicine, 3(4), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2009.191

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.