How to choose and become a reviewer for a scientific medical journal
Submitted: 11 March 2018
Accepted: 9 May 2018
Published: 20 June 2018
Accepted: 9 May 2018
Abstract Views: 1670
PDF: 702
HTML: 72
HTML: 72
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Similar Articles
- Mehdi Dadkhah, Giorgio Bianciardi, Unworthy peer review process and publishing method , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017)
- Shahryar Sorooshian, Peer review art , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 11 No. 4 (2017)
- Marco Masina, Paola Gnerre, Paola Granata, Roberto Nardi, What to know before starting the process of publishing in a medical journal , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 11 No. 3 (2017)
- Valentina Bozzato, Marianna Gnoato, Antonia Vilia, Mauro Apostolico, Intellectual property protection for scholarly publishing in the Italian framework: a globally open approach for medical and life sciences authors , Italian Journal of Medicine: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.