Original Articles
4 September 2025

Maximizing the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia by postoperative bleeding and fever prediction using demographic and intraoperative risk factors

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

The 4S percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure, involving PCNL under spinal anesthesia in a supine position and with sonographic-guided single-step puncture and dilatation for kidney stone removal, faces several complications that can hinder its success. This study, conducted over four years (2019-2023) among 653 Pakistani patients with renal stones and good renal function, aimed to identify complications based on predictors of postoperative bleeding and fever. Patients with irreversible coagulopathy or congenital kidney anomalies were excluded. Risk factors documented included gender, age, stone size, surgery time, puncture type, and calyx position. Data analysis using Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program 0.19.3 through binary logistic regression revealed that surgery time and puncture type significantly predicted both bleeding [odds ratio (OR)=1.1 (1.06-1.2) and OR=11.2 (2.8-43.3), respectively] and fever [OR=1.07 (1.03-1.12) and OR=4.8 (1.2-18.6), respectively]. The models for predicting bleeding and fever were ~97% accurate and ~100% specific, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.875 and 0.876, respectively. These findings indicate that surgery time and puncture type are key predictors of postoperative complications following 4S PCNL. This insight can guide critical intensive care unit arrangements to enhance the effectiveness of 4S PCNL and improve patient outcomes.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Wang L, Yu Y, Jiang Z, et al. Inverse association between prognostic nutritional index and kidney stone prevalence: a population-based study. PloS One 2025;20:e0318254.
Hosseini MM, Hassanpour A, Farzan R, et al. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009;23:603-7.
Boggs ZD, Regalado LE, Makary MS. Procedural fundamentals for medical students: institutional outcomes of a novel multimodal course. Acad Radiol 2022;29:1095-107.
Mak DK, Smith Y, Buchholz N, El-Husseiny T. What is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy–prone or supine? A systematic review. Arab J Urol 2016;14:101-7.
Usawachintachit M, Tzou DT, Hu W, et al. X-ray–free ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: how to select the right patient? Urology 2017;100:38-44.
Zhao Z, Fan J, Liu Y, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position! Urolithiasis 2018;46:79-86.
Falahatkar S, Farzan A, Allahkhah A. Is complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy feasible in all patients? Urol Res 2011;39:99-104.
Meena M, Mantan K, Saxena M, et al. General versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study. IAIM 2017;4:59-66.
Jamil MN, Haq F, Islam E, et al. Comparison between supine position versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single centered analysis of 623 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2022;34:1003-7.
Bux KI, Ahmed RR, Farooq F, et al. Clinical utility of STONE, Guy's Scoring System, and Renal Stone Complexity Scoring in predicting outcome of single-Tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Cureus 2023;15:e50983.
Li P, Tang Y, Zeng Q, et al. Diagnostic performance of machine learning in systemic infection following percutaneous nephrolithotomy and identification of associated risk factors. Heliyon 2024;10:e30956.
Zhang T, Zhu L, Wang X, et al. Machine learning models to predict systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol 2024;24:140.
Pakdel A, Mohammadi A, Shamshirgaran A, et al. Operation time as a prognostic indicator on postoperative complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. SAGE Open Med 2025;13:20503121251318902.
Said DF, Ferreira DB, Hayek KK, et al. Factors associated with complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1,066 cases. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2023;69:e20221089.
Iqbal N, Hasan A, Malik HA, et al. A comparison of complications and success rates after PCNL in younger and elderly patients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020;30:1316-20.
Bhatia VP, Aro T, Smith SM, et al. Frailty as predictor of complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). World J Urol 2021:3971-3977.
Taşkıran M, Dogan K. Comparison of success and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy operations according to kidney stone localization. Endoüroloji Bülteni 2023;15:115-24.
Meng R, Wang W, Zhai Z, Zuo C. Machine learning algorithm to predict postoperative bleeding complications after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Medicine 2024;103:e37050.

How to Cite



Maximizing the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia by postoperative bleeding and fever prediction using demographic and intraoperative risk factors. (2025). Italian Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2025.2035

Similar Articles

1-10 of 501

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.