Reviews

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: current status and future perspectives in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 15 January 2026
18
Views
11
Downloads

Authors

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and ranks third among cancer-related deaths globally, with over 900,000 new cases and approximately 830,000 deaths annually. Early detection is crucial, as 5-year survival exceeds 70% for lesions <3 cm treated curatively but drops below 20% in advanced stages. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018, endorsed by major guidelines, provides a standardized framework for acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of liver lesions in high-risk patients. Using five major imaging features—non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, enhancing capsule, lesion size, and threshold growth—alongside optional ancillary features, the LR-5 category achieves >95% positive predictive value for HCC. Meta-analyses of over 3300 observations report 86% sensitivity and 85% specificity for CT/MRI LI-RADS, with gadoxetate-enhanced MRI reaching 88-91% sensitivity. Key limitations include overcalling benign hypervascular nodules, underdiagnosing hypovascular or well-differentiated HCC (up to 30% of lesions <2 cm), and misclassifying intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or combined HCC-CCA as LR-5 (up to 40-50%). The LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm v2024 introduces criteria for radioembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy, improving specificity for viable residual disease detection (93% vs. 86% for mRECIST). Future directions include artificial intelligence (82-90% accuracy), radiomics, multimodal imaging, and liquid biomarkers to reduce inter-reader variability and enhance prognostic stratification. Over a decade since its introduction, LI-RADS v2018 remains the reference standard for non-invasive HCC diagnosis and is evolving toward precision oncology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49.
Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7:6.
Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022;76:681-93.
Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2018;68:723-50.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018;69:182-236.
Kamal O, Roudenko A, Diab M, et al. Common pitfalls and diagnostic challenges in the application of LI-RADS CT/MRI algorithms: a comprehensive review. Abdom Radiol 2025;50:2944-57.
Elsayes KM, Kielar AZ, Chernyak V, et al. LI-RADS: a conceptual and historical review from its beginning to its recent integration into AASLD clinical practice guidance. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2019;6:49-69.
Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, et al. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018: imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Radiology 2018;289:816-30.
Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2023;78:1922-65.
Purysko AS, Remer EM, Coppa CP, et al. LI-RADS: a case-based review of the new categorization of liver findings in patients with end-stage liver disease. Radiographics 2012;32:1977-95.
Tang A, Bashir MR, Corwin MT, et al. Evidence supporting LI-RADS major features for CT- and MR imaging-based diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Radiology 2018;286:29-48.
Ren AH, Zhao PF, Yang DW, et al. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:746-55.
Wakate Teruya AK, Miranda J, Leão Filho H, et al. LI-RADS TRA V2024: innovations in imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to locoregional therapies. Abdom Radiol 2025. doi:10.1007/s00261-025-05110-8.
Choi SY, Kim SH, Park CK, et al. Imaging features of gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for identifying cytokeratin 19-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2018;286:897-908.
Liang Y, Xu F, Guo Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2021;134:109404.
Shin J, Lee S, Yoon JK, et al. LI-RADS major features on MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;54:518-25.
Chen J, Kuang S, Zhang Y, et al. Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI. Abdom Radiol 2021;46:1530-1542.
Liu Q, Liu T, Liu X, et al. The efficacy of modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) using Sonazoid in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024;14:2927-37.
Cao J, Shon A, Yoon L, et al. Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease. Eur Radiol 2024;34:7622-31.
Kim DH, Kim B, Choi JI, et al. LI-RADS treatment response versus modified RECIST for diagnosing viable hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi 2022;83:331-43.
Jang HJ, Choi SH, Choi SJ, et al. LI-RADS version 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma <1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2023;33:5792-800.
Eschrich J, Kobus Z, Geisel D, et al. The diagnostic approach towards combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma – state of the art and future perspectives. Cancers 2023;15:301.
Barat M, Nguyen TTL, Hollande C, et al. LI-RADS v2018 major criteria: do hepatocellular carcinomas in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis differ from those in virus-induced chronic liver disease on MRI? Eur J Radiol 2021;138:109651.
Mulé S, Ronot M, Ghosn M, et al. Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning. JHEP Rep 2023;5:100857
Zhang J, Liu J, Guo M, et al. DeepSeek-assisted LI-RADS classification: AI-driven precision in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Int J Surg 2025;111:5970-9.
Park J, Bae JS, Kim JM, et al. Development of a deep-learning model for classification of LI-RADS major features by using subtraction images of MRI. Abdom Radiol 2023;48:2547-56.
Xiao M, Deng Y, Zheng W, et al. Machine learning model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisting LI-RADS diagnosis of HCC. Heliyon 2024;10:e38850.
Liang L, Pang J, Zhang B, et al. Integrating CEUS imaging features and LI-RADS classification for postoperative early recurrence prediction in solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2025;12:1287-300.
Huang H, Cheng MQ, He DN, et al. US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment. Eur Radiol. 2023;33:9357-67.
Wei H, Yang T, Chen J, et al. Prognostic implications of CT/MRI LI-RADS in hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and future directions. Liver Int 2022;42:2131-44.

How to Cite



Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: current status and future perspectives in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. (2026). Italian Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2026.2413

Most read articles by the same author(s)